My dear old dad lived until he was 91. He used to run/jog daily for several years in his 40-60s. It kind of did a number on his knees, but then so did the 60+ years of downhill skiing he enjoyed. He also did long distance bicycling trips. What was of more risk and what was of more benefit to him — exercising or the cumulative strain when he was in his late senior years?
I see so many runners around my neighbourhood. I see soccer teams, baseball teams, busy tennis courts, a few outdoor swimming pools in the summer. Generally and specifically, exercise is good for people. Risks can be mitigated and kept in mind.
Yes, some sports can have a high impact on the body in terms of pounding and/or straining certain joints, muscle sets, and so on. My niece ruined her knee at age 30 on the soccer field. A cleat caught and her forward motion kept going (due to the laws of physics). She tore everything. It’s not something she could have foreseen. Should people stop playing soccer?
I’m not sure we have the actual right to say that something is too dangerous for someone unless we are their physician.
Isn’t the point to do things so that we get the health benefits, and we do things as safely as possible so that we hopefully don’t cause ourselves inadvertent injury? In my dad’s day, people didn’t connect the skiing and running with joint issues. My niece didn’t mean to catch her cleat and injure herself. I wouldn’t have thought to tell either of them that they should not do those activities. I
might have noted that there are risks. However, my dad and my niece would know that anyway.
Everything – EVERYTHING – can carry a risk. Unless we are someone’s physician, I don’t think it’s our place to tell others that normally healthy sports are
not good for them. Sorry I ranted. I hope for us to be supportive of how people try to care for themselves. Just my two cents.
I’m hoping to get a walk or some sitting cycling in today.
