I used to have trouble with the idea that āfeelings are not facts.ā My objection was that, if I feel bad, then it is definitely a fact that I feel bad! However, the fact that I feel bad is not proof that I am bad or have done bad. In CBT, this is the cognitive distortion of emotional reasoning.
It was an a-ha moment for me to get it that, my feelings are real, but that my tacit assumptions can lead me to invalid (ie, inconsistent with observable states of the world) conclusions.
There is an unfortunate conflation of the senses behind the word āvalid.ā In the vernacular, validity often means understandable or relatable. Itās the opposite of gaslighting.
In science and logic, valid is the meaning used in your OP, namely consistent with the available evidence. In logic class, we are taught to evaluate an argument as whether it is valid (consistent with observations) and sound (free of cognitive bias or inconsistent logic). The problem with cognitive distortions is they are usually a logical error combined with a cognitive bias. Thatās what makes them harder to spot.
Thank you for attending Jackās pontifications series, episode #394