I’m in agreement with this.
Just browsing headlines is often enough at this point. Reading the actual content is rarely needed, unless perhaps it's something that will affect my wallet for the upcoming year due to new economic changes.
It’s sometimes the way it presents itself and providing no context as to why it’s being shared. My mind then makes all these instant assumptions. Perhaps the sites are also indeed optimized for doom scrolling.
If I were to see the news cycle/algorithms as if it’s coming from a single individual then it gets more confusing. Let’s say what if it were a social media feed of a person.
“Why is this person sharing where bombs have dropped in a warzone with graphic imagery and in the same moment sharing that a football club is happily lifting the trophy for winning that season and celebrating?”
The contrast is just too much… I’d think that this person may need to have their priorities set straight.
“The world is going to end, everything is going to shit, you should feel bad and concerned about it all the time.”
Followed by:
“And here’s the weather forecast… besides rain and temperatures rising we also have bombs dropping from the sky”.
Good day to you sir.
The news never reflects upon itself and never apologizes for triggering people.
Thanks
@Atreides for sharing!
